🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have scraped a vast number of songs from Spotify and is preparing to release them online.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Observers said the apparent data breach could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for material to train their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of metadata such as performer and album names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not represent its entire inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and used questionable tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Goal and Worries

Spotify does not think the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a method of sharing large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s information and heritage”.

AI Training and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would likely be utilized for developing AI models.

“Educating models on illegally sourced data is sadly common in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “create their own personal free version of Spotify”. The executive added it could also allow tech companies to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between artists, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies utilize protected work without consent unless the owner opts out. Virtually every participant to a government consultation on the proposal has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and technology informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.